China’s Engagement in ISDS Reform: Text, Practice, and Political Economy

Authors

  • Wei Shen Shanghai Jiaotong University Law School No.1954 Huashan Road, Shanghai 200030 P. R. China. Author
  • Shuping Li Shanghai Jiaotong University Law School No.1954 Huashan Road, Shanghai 200030 P. R. China. Author

Keywords:

ISDS, ISDS Reform, BIT, International Investment Arbitration, Political Economy

Abstract

The investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system is such a means to an end of further economic development and wider social political goals. With major protective provisions of expropriation against compensation, fair and equitable treatment, national treatment, most-favored-nation treatment, full protection and security and umbrella clause, it helps establish a predictable, transparent, and enforceable legal regime to protect foreign investors’ legitimate expectations and lawful investment. As China intends to attract foreign investments by offering a stable business operation environment, its signing a large number of BITs and FTAs may help reduce political and socio-economic risks, which give states, businesses, and individuals the confidence to work in a coordinated manner. The economic development goal, rule of law strategy, tense US-China relations, ideology of multilateralism and community of common destiny, all add up to China’s inclination to incremental but effective ISDS reform.

Published

2024-02-21

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

91-100 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.