Taming SOEs within a Redefined Competition Policy Framework: An Alternative Approach for Consensus?

Authors

  • Pinguang Ying Shanghai University of International Business and Economics 620 Gubei Road, Shanghai 200336, P.R. China. Author

Keywords:

SOEs, Competition Policy, Trade Policy, Fair Competition Review, Competitive Neutrality

Abstract

With the growing concern of the international community about the negative spillover effects of SOEs on trade, reaching a consensus among different stakeholders has become increasingly urgent. This paper argues that strengthening a redefined competition policy is a feasible alternative, or at least a complementary option to the existing trade framework. The reasons are as follows: (a) surrounding SOEs is not only trade-related, but also competition-related; (b) the existing SOE disciplines have defects when it comes to dealing with competition distortion effects; and (c) characteristics of competition policy make it easier to reach a “maximum common divisor” among all parties. Accordingly, competition policy needs to be redefined and pursued from an international and domestic level. It is necessary to strengthen the fundamental position of competition policy in China by integrating it into SOE reform measures, advancing the implementation of the Fair Competition Review System, and promoting the construction of the competitive neutrality system.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-21

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

101-110 of 112

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.